Everything you need to catch broken customer journeys
CheckyWorky is built for small teams: fewer knobs, clearer signals, and alerts you can actually act on.
End-to-end workflow checks
Not just "is it up?" — more like "can a customer actually sign up?"
Step-by-step assertions
Confirm the right page loaded, the button exists, the success message appears.
Screenshots on failure
No guessing. You see what the check saw.
Smart alerting
Slack, email, and webhooks — routed to the right humans.
Schedules you control
Run more often for money journeys, less often for the rest.
Retry before panic
Reduce noisy alerts with simple retry logic.
Environment-friendly
Monitor prod, staging, or both (when you're ready).
Team-ready
Share checks, assign ownership, and keep everyone in the loop.
The “starter set”
Most teams start with these three checks:
Login
Signup
Checkout / upgrade
Frequently asked questions
Uptime monitoring pings a URL and checks if it responds. A workflow check navigates your product like a real customer — filling in forms, clicking buttons, and verifying that the right things happen. It catches the bugs that exist when your site is "up" but broken.
You can have your first check running in under 10 minutes. Pick a journey, define the steps, add a couple of assertions, and schedule it.
Yes. Every failure alert includes a screenshot of the page at the moment the check failed, so you can immediately see what went wrong.
Uptime checks typically verify that a URL responds (often just HTTP 200 + latency). Workflow checks validate the full customer journey—e.g., signup → email verification → login → checkout—so you catch failures that still return 200s (broken forms, auth redirects, JS errors, missing buttons, payment failures, or API schema changes). This is especially useful for SaaS where the app can be “up” while key flows are unusable.
Use layered assertions: (1) page-level: URL/redirect expectations, status codes, and core text present (e.g., “Welcome back”); (2) element-level: button enabled, field visible, modal closed; (3) data-level: API response contains expected JSON keys/values; (4) business outcome: user lands on /app after login, invoice created, subscription status becomes “active”. Pair assertions with screenshots and console/network error capture so alerts include evidence, not just “failed.”
Retries should be configurable and intentional: retry only on flaky failure modes (timeouts, transient DNS, intermittent 5xx), and avoid retrying on deterministic failures (assertion mismatch like missing element text). A good pattern for small teams is 1–2 quick retries (e.g., 10–30s apart) plus alert on first failure for high-impact flows (login/checkout), while lower-impact flows can alert after retries to reduce noise.
Yes, but plan for the auth method: for session-based apps, store encrypted credentials/secrets and validate post-login assertions; for OAuth, use dedicated test tenants and service accounts; for magic links/OTP, integrate with a test inbox (or API-based email provider) and assert the link/token is consumed. For 2FA, many teams use a bypass in test environments or a dedicated TOTP seed stored as an encrypted secret. Always isolate synthetic users from real customer data and apply least-privilege roles.
Route by impact and ownership: send P1 flows (signup/login/billing) to a shared Slack channel with @oncall mentions; send lower-severity issues to email or a triage channel; use webhooks to create issues (Jira/GitHub) only after a sustained failure window. Include run metadata in alerts (step failed, assertion message, screenshot link, last successful run, region) so the first responder can act without asking for more context.
Screenshots turn “it failed” into a concrete UI state: error banners, blank pages, unexpected modals, consent screens, captcha triggers, or layout shifts that hide buttons. Capture at least on failure, and optionally at key milestones (post-login, pre-checkout, post-payment). For SPAs, also capture console errors and failed network requests—many workflow breakages come from JS exceptions or blocked API calls that still return HTTP 200 for the shell page.
Prefer stable selectors (data-testid) over brittle CSS/XPath, and assert on invariant signals (URL patterns, key headings, presence of critical buttons) rather than exact copy. Pin the synthetic user to a known experiment cohort where possible, disable experiments for test accounts, and set locale/timezone explicitly. For dynamic values (timestamps, prices with discounts), assert ranges or patterns instead of exact matches.
By the numbers
Organizations with mature observability practices are more likely to resolve incidents faster and reduce downtime impact versus less mature peers.
Google Cloud, DORA research (Accelerate / DORA reports) (2023)A large share of user-facing outages are caused by changes (deployments, configuration, dependency updates) rather than hardware failures—making regression detection in key journeys critical.
Google Cloud, DORA research (Change failure rate / incident drivers discussion across DORA publications) (2023)Synthetic monitoring is commonly used alongside RUM to detect issues before users report them, particularly for login and checkout flows where “200 OK” can still mean broken UX.
Datadog, State of Monitoring / Observability content and product guidance on Synthetic + RUM (2024)Mean time to detect (MTTD) is strongly influenced by alert quality (actionable context, low noise) rather than alert volume—teams that reduce noisy alerts respond faster.
PagerDuty, State of Digital Operations (incident response and alert noise findings) (2024)Real-world examples
Signup flow breaks on a “harmless” frontend deploy
Scenario: A small SaaS ships a new pricing page layout. The /signup page still returns 200, but the “Create account” button is pushed below the fold on smaller viewports and a cookie banner overlaps it. Real users can’t complete signup on mobile.
Outcome: Workflow check fails on the step asserting the button is visible/clickable; failure alert includes a screenshot showing the overlay. Team rolls back within 15 minutes instead of discovering via a drop in signups hours later.
Login redirect loop caused by misconfigured auth callback
Scenario: An environment variable change updates the OAuth callback URL. Users get redirected between /login and /auth/callback with no visible error. Status codes are 200/302, so basic uptime checks pass.
Outcome: Workflow check asserts that authenticated users land on /app and that a known element (e.g., account menu) is present. The check fails and captures the redirect chain + screenshot, cutting MTTD from “customer ticket” to minutes.
Billing failure due to third-party payment dependency
Scenario: Stripe (or another payment provider) has intermittent API errors in one region. Your app loads fine, but checkout fails after card submission with a generic error toast. Support starts seeing “payment won’t go through” messages.
Outcome: Billing workflow check retries once for transient network errors, then alerts with the exact step and screenshot of the error toast. Team quickly confirms provider-side issue, posts a status update, and routes users to an alternate payment method—reducing support volume and churn risk.
Silent API schema change breaks an SPA page
Scenario: A backend deploy changes a JSON field name used by the frontend. The SPA shell returns 200, but the dashboard renders blank due to a JS exception. Only logged-in users are affected.
Outcome: Authenticated workflow check asserts dashboard widgets render and captures console errors on failure. The alert includes the exception message and screenshot, enabling a fast hotfix without waiting for multiple customer reports.
Key insights
1.
“200 OK” is not success for SaaS: the highest-impact failures are often broken UI states, auth redirects, or JS errors that only show up when you click through the journey.
2.
Workflow checks are most valuable on revenue and activation paths: signup, login, password reset, checkout, and invoice/payment confirmation.
3.
Alert fatigue kills response speed—small teams get better outcomes from fewer, higher-signal checks with strong assertions and rich evidence (screenshots, failed step, last success).
4.
Retries should be selective: they reduce noise for flaky network/third-party issues, but they shouldn’t hide deterministic regressions like missing elements or wrong redirects.
5.
Screenshots (and ideally console/network capture) dramatically shorten time-to-triage because they show the exact user-facing failure mode without reproducing locally.
6.
Routing matters as much as detection: Slack for fast human response, email for lower urgency, and webhooks for automation (create an incident, open a ticket, page on-call).
7.
Stability comes from testability: teams that add stable selectors (data-testid), dedicated synthetic users, and controlled cohorts (A/B, locale) keep checks reliable as the product evolves.
Pro tips
💡
Start with 3 checks that map to money and access: (1) signup completes, (2) login lands on the app dashboard, (3) checkout creates an active subscription. Add one assertion per step and require a screenshot on failure.
💡
Create a dedicated “synthetic” tenant/user role with least privilege and seeded test data (one plan, one coupon, one test card). This keeps checks stable and avoids touching real customer records.
💡
Route alerts by severity: send login/billing failures to Slack with an on-call mention, and use a webhook to auto-open a GitHub/Jira issue only after N consecutive failures to prevent ticket spam.
How CheckyWorky compares
vs Datadog Synthetics
Powerful at enterprise scale with deep Datadog integration, but can be heavier to configure and operate for small teams. CheckyWorky’s positioning emphasizes quick setup of core SaaS journeys (signup/login/billing), practical defaults (assertions + screenshots + simple routing), and a small-team friendly workflow-first experience.
vs Checkly
Developer-centric and strong for code-defined checks (Playwright) and CI integration. CheckyWorky differentiates by focusing on “pretend customer” workflows with straightforward alert routing and evidence (screenshots, step-level assertions) aimed at teams that want coverage fast without building a full monitoring codebase.
vs UptimeRobot
Excellent for basic uptime/keyword checks and low-cost availability monitoring. CheckyWorky is built for multi-step customer journeys (auth, forms, billing) where simple ping/HTTP checks miss the real failures.